Song of Songs Chapter 1

Introduction to Song of Songs

The Song of Songs, also called the Song of Solomon, is one of the most beautiful and carefully written books in the Old Testament. Its opening verse identifies Solomon as the associated author or central figure of the book.

Song of Songs 1:1, “The song of songs, which is Solomon’s.”

The title “Song of Songs” means the greatest song, the finest song, or the supreme song. This is similar to expressions such as “King of kings” and “Lord of lords,” where repetition intensifies the meaning. The book presents itself as the highest song, a poetic celebration of love, marriage, desire, covenant faithfulness, beauty, and joy within the bounds of God’s created order.

From a conservative and literal reading of Scripture, Song of Songs should first be understood as wisdom poetry celebrating marital love between a man and a woman. It is not merely an allegory, though it has often been treated that way throughout church history. The book certainly contains spiritual lessons about love, faithfulness, pursuit, longing, delight, and covenant devotion, but its primary subject is the beauty of love as God designed it. The marriage relationship was created by God before the fall, and therefore physical attraction, romantic pursuit, and marital intimacy are not dirty or shameful when kept within the covenant boundaries established by God.

Genesis 2:18, “And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone, I will make him an help meet for him.”

Genesis 2:21, “And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept, and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof.”

Genesis 2:22, “And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.”

Genesis 2:23, “And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh, she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.”

Genesis 2:24, “Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife, and they shall be one flesh.”

Genesis 2:25, “And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed.”

Song of Songs belongs in the wisdom section of the Old Testament. It stands alongside Proverbs and Ecclesiastes as part of the Solomonic wisdom tradition. Proverbs gives wisdom for disciplined living, Ecclesiastes examines the vanity of life under the sun apart from God, and Song of Songs celebrates the goodness of covenant love when received as a gift from God. The book reminds the reader that wisdom is not merely intellectual or moral, it also governs desire, affection, speech, attraction, loyalty, patience, and the honoring of one’s spouse.

The book is poetic rather than narrative prose. It uses imagery, symbolism, repetition, dialogue, and dramatic movement. The speakers shift between the beloved woman, the man, and the daughters of Jerusalem. Because the book is poetry, its language should be read carefully, not crudely. The imagery is rich, ancient, and often rooted in gardens, vineyards, flocks, spices, perfumes, royal processions, and the natural beauty of Israel. The goal is not to reduce every image to a mechanical meaning, but to understand how the imagery communicates admiration, longing, beauty, exclusivity, and delight.

A major theme of the book is the goodness of marital love. The Bible does not present marriage as merely functional. Marriage is not only for childbearing, household order, or social stability, though it includes those things. Scripture also presents marriage as companionship, delight, protection, intimacy, and covenant loyalty. Song of Songs shows that a husband and wife are meant to cherish one another, speak well of one another, pursue one another, and enjoy one another without shame when their love is rightly ordered before God.

Proverbs 5:18, “Let thy fountain be blessed, and rejoice with the wife of thy youth.”

Proverbs 5:19, “Let her be as the loving hind and pleasant roe, let her breasts satisfy thee at all times, and be thou ravished always with her love.”

Another major theme is exclusivity. The love celebrated in Song of Songs is not casual, cheap, or promiscuous. It is guarded, treasured, and reserved. Repeatedly, the woman warns the daughters of Jerusalem not to awaken love before its proper time. This teaches that love is powerful and must not be stirred carelessly. Desire is not evil, but uncontrolled desire becomes destructive. Godly wisdom teaches patience, restraint, and covenant order.

Song of Songs 2:7, “I charge you, O ye daughters of Jerusalem, by the roes, and by the hinds of the field, that ye stir not up, nor awake my love, till he please.”

Song of Songs 3:5, “I charge you, O ye daughters of Jerusalem, by the roes, and by the hinds of the field, that ye stir not up, nor awake my love, till he please.”

Song of Songs 8:4, “I charge you, O daughters of Jerusalem, that ye stir not up, nor awake my love, until he please.”

Song of Songs also presents love as strong, costly, and enduring. Near the end of the book, love is described as powerful as death and impossible to purchase with wealth. This is one of the theological high points of the book. True covenant love cannot be reduced to lust, money, status, or convenience. It is faithful, possessive in the right sense, sacrificial, and enduring.

Song of Songs 8:6, “Set me as a seal upon thine heart, as a seal upon thine arm, for love is strong as death, jealousy is cruel as the grave, the coals thereof are coals of fire, which hath a most vehement flame.”

Song of Songs 8:7, “Many waters cannot quench love, neither can the floods drown it, if a man would give all the substance of his house for love, it would utterly be contemned.”

The book also has theological significance because marriage itself is used throughout Scripture as a picture of covenant relationship. In the Old Testament, the LORD often describes His covenant relationship with Israel using marriage language. Israel’s idolatry is described as spiritual adultery because she belonged to the LORD by covenant. This does not mean Song of Songs should be flattened into pure allegory, but it does mean that the marriage covenant points beyond itself to larger covenant truths.

Isaiah 54:5, “For thy Maker is thine husband, the LORD of hosts is his name, and thy Redeemer the Holy One of Israel, The God of the whole earth shall he be called.”

Jeremiah 31:32, “Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD.”

In the New Testament, marriage is also used to picture Christ and the church. The husband’s love for his wife is compared to Christ’s sacrificial love for the church. Therefore, while Song of Songs should be read literally as a celebration of marital love, Christian readers can rightly see that godly marriage reflects something greater than itself. Marriage displays covenant love, sacrificial leadership, faithful devotion, purity, and delight.

Ephesians 5:25, “Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it.”

Ephesians 5:26, “That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word.”

Ephesians 5:27, “That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing, but that it should be holy and without blemish.”

Ephesians 5:28, “So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself.”

Ephesians 5:29, “For no man ever yet hated his own flesh, but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the Lord the church.”

Ephesians 5:30, “For we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones.”

Ephesians 5:31, “For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh.”

Ephesians 5:32, “This is a great mystery, but I speak concerning Christ and the church.”

Song of Songs also corrects two common errors. The first error is sensual corruption, which tears desire away from covenant and turns love into selfish appetite. The second error is false spirituality, which treats the body, affection, beauty, and marital intimacy as if they are beneath godliness. Scripture rejects both errors. God created man and woman, God created marriage, and God declared His creation good. Sin corrupts desire, but redemption restores the whole person under the lordship of God.

The book is especially important in a culture that has cheapened love. Modern society often treats romance as entertainment, sexuality as self-expression, and marriage as optional convenience. Song of Songs presents a better and older way. It shows love as exclusive, ordered, patient, poetic, honorable, and covenantal. A man and woman are not merely consumers of one another. They are called to belong to one another within the sacred bond of marriage.

The structure of Song of Songs is difficult because it is not written like a modern narrative. It appears as a sequence of lyrical scenes, conversations, memories, dreams, separations, reunions, admiration speeches, and reflections on love. The movement of the book includes attraction, courtship, longing, marriage, conflict, reconciliation, and mature covenant love. The recurring voices and repeated phrases bind the book together.

A simple working outline is as follows. Song of Songs 1:1 introduces the book. Song of Songs 1:2 through 2:7 presents the beginning of longing, admiration, and delight. Song of Songs 2:8 through 3:5 develops pursuit, desire, and the warning not to awaken love before its time. Song of Songs 3:6 through 5:1 presents the royal wedding imagery and the consummation of covenant love. Song of Songs 5:2 through 6:13 presents distance, searching, conflict, and renewed admiration. Song of Songs 7:1 through 8:4 presents deepened delight and mutual belonging. Song of Songs 8:5 through 8:14 concludes with mature love, covenant permanence, and the strength of love that cannot be bought or drowned.

The central theological message of Song of Songs is that covenant love between husband and wife is a good gift from God, and it must be honored, protected, enjoyed, and kept within the boundaries of wisdom. The book does not apologize for beauty, desire, or affection. It sanctifies them by placing them inside the covenant order God established from the beginning. Properly understood, Song of Songs teaches that love is not merely emotion, and it is not merely physical attraction. True love is exclusive, faithful, patient, delighted, and covenantal.

Song of Songs 1

“Rightly Do They Love You”

A. Introduction to the Maiden, the Beloved, and the Daughters of Jerusalem

1. Song of Songs 1:1, The Title, The Song of All Songs

Song of Songs 1:1, “The song of songs, which is Solomon’s.”

The book opens with the title, “The song of songs, which is Solomon’s.” This expression identifies the book as the greatest song, the supreme song, or the finest song. Just as “King of kings” means the highest King, and “Lord of lords” means the highest Lord, so “Song of Songs” means the highest song. It is not merely one song among many, but a song set apart by its excellence, beauty, and importance.

The association with Solomon is significant because Solomon was known for wisdom, poetry, and song. Scripture tells us that Solomon wrote many proverbs and songs.

1 Kings 4:32, “And he spake three thousand proverbs: and his songs were a thousand and five.”

Out of Solomon’s thousand and five songs, this one is called “the song of songs.” That means Scripture itself places this book in a category of supreme poetic and theological value. It is not an accidental inclusion in the canon. It is not an embarrassment to be explained away. It is the inspired Word of God, and it teaches the goodness of love, desire, beauty, covenant faithfulness, and marital delight within the boundaries God established.

Song of Songs is unique because it contains very little direct religious language. It does not read like Psalms, Proverbs, Isaiah, or the historical books. The name of God is not repeatedly mentioned, sacrifices are not described, and the temple is not the center of the book. Yet this does not make the book secular in a godless sense. Rather, it shows that God’s authority extends over all of life, including love, marriage, attraction, speech, longing, romance, and physical intimacy. The absence of frequent religious vocabulary does not mean the absence of divine truth. The book is Scripture, and therefore it reveals God’s wisdom concerning one of the most powerful areas of human life.

The book has been known by several titles. Some call it Song of Solomon, emphasizing its connection with Solomon. Others call it Song of Songs, following the opening phrase. Some older traditions call it Canticles, from the Latin word meaning songs. Regardless of the title used, the book presents itself as a poetic masterpiece concerning covenant love.

The history of interpretation has often struggled with this book. Some interpreters have avoided it because of its romantic and sensual language. Others have treated it almost entirely as an allegory, seeing the woman as Israel or the church and the man as the LORD or Christ. There are certainly spiritual applications that may be drawn from the book because Scripture often uses marriage as a picture of covenant relationship. However, the first and plain meaning of the book is not allegory. The best starting point is to read it literally as inspired wisdom poetry about love between a man and a woman, courtship, marriage, longing, admiration, desire, conflict, restoration, and covenant delight.

This literal reading does not lower the book. It honors the book. God created marriage before the fall. God created the man and the woman. God created the body. God created attraction. God created the marriage covenant. Therefore, marital love is not dirty when governed by God’s order. Sin corrupts desire, but God’s design sanctifies desire inside marriage.

Genesis 2:18, “And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone, I will make him an help meet for him.”

Genesis 2:21, “And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept, and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof.”

Genesis 2:22, “And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.”

Genesis 2:23, “And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh, she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.”

Genesis 2:24, “Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife, and they shall be one flesh.”

Genesis 2:25, “And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed.”

These verses establish the theological foundation for Song of Songs. Before sin entered the world, God joined one man and one woman together in covenant union. They were naked and not ashamed. This means that marital intimacy was part of God’s good creation before the fall. Song of Songs celebrates that original design. It does not treat marriage as merely functional, cold, or contractual. It presents marriage as covenantal, affectionate, joyful, exclusive, and deeply personal.

This book also corrects false spirituality. Some have imagined that the truly spiritual life requires rejection of marriage or suspicion toward physical affection. That is not the biblical view. Scripture honors marriage.

Hebrews 13:4, “Marriage is honourable in all, and the bed undefiled: but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge.”

This verse is crucial. Marriage is honorable. The marriage bed is undefiled. God condemns fornication and adultery, but He does not condemn marital intimacy. Song of Songs stands as a beautiful Old Testament witness to that truth. It teaches that love and physical desire must not be separated from covenant faithfulness, but it also teaches that covenant faithfulness does not destroy desire, it protects it.

Jesus Himself affirmed the created order of marriage.

Matthew 19:4, “And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female,”

Matthew 19:5, “And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?”

Matthew 19:6, “Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.”

Jesus grounds marriage in creation. He does not treat marriage as a human invention or cultural arrangement. Marriage is God’s work. Therefore, a biblical reading of Song of Songs must begin with the fact that God designed marriage, and that the love celebrated in this book belongs within that sacred covenant.

The New Testament also permits singleness as a gift and calling for some, especially for undivided service to the Lord, but it never treats marriage as inferior or impure.

1 Corinthians 7:7, “For I would that all men were even as I myself. But every man hath his proper gift of God, one after this manner, and another after that.”

1 Corinthians 7:32, “But I would have you without carefulness. He that is unmarried careth for the things that belong to the Lord, how he may please the Lord:”

1 Corinthians 7:33, “But he that is married careth for the things that are of the world, how he may please his wife.”

1 Corinthians 7:34, “There is difference also between a wife and a virgin. The unmarried woman careth for the things of the Lord, that she may be holy both in body and in spirit, but she that is married careth for the things of the world, how she may please her husband.”

1 Corinthians 7:35, “And this I speak for your own profit, not that I may cast a snare upon you, but for that which is comely, and that ye may attend upon the Lord without distraction.”

Paul recognizes the usefulness of singleness for undistracted service, but he also recognizes marriage as normal, honorable, and good. Song of Songs therefore belongs within a whole biblical theology of marriage and singleness. It does not say every person must marry, but it does say that marital love itself is good when kept within God’s covenant order.

The book also has secondary spiritual application because Scripture repeatedly uses marriage to describe covenant relationship. In the Old Testament, the LORD speaks of His covenant with Israel using marriage language.

Isaiah 54:5, “For thy Maker is thine husband, the LORD of hosts is his name, and thy Redeemer the Holy One of Israel, The God of the whole earth shall he be called.”

Jeremiah 31:32, “Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD:”

In the New Testament, marriage points to Christ and the church.

Ephesians 5:25, “Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it,”

Ephesians 5:26, “That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word,”

Ephesians 5:27, “That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing, but that it should be holy and without blemish.”

Ephesians 5:28, “So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself.”

Ephesians 5:29, “For no man ever yet hated his own flesh, but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the Lord the church:”

Ephesians 5:30, “For we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones.”

Ephesians 5:31, “For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh.”

Ephesians 5:32, “This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church.”

These verses show why Song of Songs may rightly be applied spiritually, but carefully. Marriage can illustrate Christ’s covenant love for His people, but Song of Songs should not be interpreted in a fanciful way where every detail is forced into hidden symbolism. The literal meaning comes first. The spiritual application comes second. That keeps interpretation sober, grammatical, historical, and faithful to the text.

Solomon’s connection to the book also raises a serious moral issue. Solomon was wise, but he did not always live wisely. Scripture records his tragic compromise in marriage.

1 Kings 11:1, “But king Solomon loved many strange women, together with the daughter of Pharaoh, women of the Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Zidonians, and Hittites,”

1 Kings 11:2, “Of the nations concerning which the LORD said unto the children of Israel, Ye shall not go in to them, neither shall they come in unto you, for surely they will turn away your heart after their gods, Solomon clave unto these in love.”

1 Kings 11:3, “And he had seven hundred wives, princesses, and three hundred concubines, and his wives turned away his heart.”

This is a sobering warning. Solomon could write wisely about love, but later he failed terribly in the discipline of love. The man who could celebrate exclusive covenant love also violated that very wisdom through multiplied marriages and foreign alliances. This does not weaken the inspiration of Song of Songs. Rather, it strengthens the warning that knowing truth is not the same as obeying truth. A man may understand wisdom and still act foolishly if his desires are not governed by fear of the LORD.

The primary speakers in the book are the Shulamite woman, the beloved man, and the daughters of Jerusalem. Some interpreters argue for a three person drama involving Solomon, a shepherd, and the maiden, but the simpler reading sees the beloved as Solomon, the maiden as the Shulamite, and the daughters of Jerusalem as a chorus observing and responding to the love relationship. The speaker labels can sometimes be difficult, and different translations divide the dialogue differently. That means the interpreter must be careful, but the major themes are clear.

Song of Songs should be read as a collection of poetic scenes rather than a strict chronological story. It gives snapshots of courtship, admiration, longing, union, separation, searching, reconciliation, and mature love. It is not arranged like a modern biography or romance novel. Its structure is lyrical and reflective. Because it is poetry, the imagery must be handled with reverence, restraint, and common sense.

The great theological point of the opening title is that God included a supreme love song in Scripture. That alone teaches us something. The God of the Bible is not embarrassed by marriage. He is not embarrassed by affection. He is not embarrassed by beauty. He is not embarrassed by covenant desire. What He condemns is the corruption of these gifts through lust, adultery, fornication, selfishness, manipulation, and unfaithfulness.

Song of Songs therefore calls the reader back to honorable love. It teaches that a man and woman should not treat each other as disposable objects. It teaches that desire must be governed by covenant. It teaches that love should include admiration, respect, delight, restraint, faithfulness, and joy. It teaches that marriage is not merely a legal arrangement, but a holy and deeply personal union established by God.

2. Song of Songs 1:2–4a, The Opening Words of the Maiden

Song of Songs 1:2, “Let him kiss me with the kisses of his mouth: for thy love is better than wine.”

Song of Songs 1:3, “Because of the savour of thy good ointments thy name is as ointment poured forth, therefore do the virgins love thee.”

Song of Songs 1:4, “Draw me, we will run after thee: the king hath brought me into his chambers: we will be glad and rejoice in thee, we will remember thy love more than wine: the upright love thee.”

The first voice heard after the title is the voice of the woman. This is significant. Song of Songs gives the woman a strong voice. She is not portrayed as cold, passive, or merely acted upon. She speaks openly, poetically, and passionately of her desire for her beloved. Her words are not presented as shameful because they are directed toward covenant love. This is not the speech of immoral lust, but the speech of rightly ordered affection.

She begins, “Let him kiss me with the kisses of his mouth.” This is direct and intimate language. The book does not begin with abstract theory about love. It begins with longing. The woman desires the affection of the man she loves. This should not be made crude, but neither should it be sanitized until it loses its meaning. God inspired this language, and it teaches that affectionate desire within the proper relationship is good.

The phrase “for thy love is better than wine” compares love to something associated with gladness, celebration, and delight. Wine in Scripture can symbolize joy when used rightly.

Psalm 104:14, “He causeth the grass to grow for the cattle, and herb for the service of man, that he may bring forth food out of the earth,”

Psalm 104:15, “And wine that maketh glad the heart of man, and oil to make his face to shine, and bread which strengtheneth man’s heart.”

The maiden says that his love is better than wine. His affection is more refreshing, more gladdening, and more satisfying than earthly celebration. This teaches that love is not merely physical. It affects the whole person. Proper love strengthens, cheers, and refreshes the heart.

She then says, “Because of the savour of thy good ointments thy name is as ointment poured forth.” In the ancient world, ointments, perfumes, and fragrant oils were associated with beauty, refreshment, honor, and attraction. His name is compared to ointment poured forth. In biblical thought, a name represents more than a label. It represents character, reputation, and identity. She is attracted not merely to his appearance, but to who he is.

This is an important principle. Biblical love is not blind infatuation. She values his name, meaning his character. There is physical desire in the text, but it is not separated from moral admiration. She sees him as desirable because he is honorable. This is the difference between covenant love and shallow attraction. A woman may notice a man physically, but she must also ask whether his name, character, reputation, discipline, and conduct are worthy of respect.

Proverbs 22:1, “A good name is rather to be chosen than great riches, and loving favour rather than silver and gold.”

This verse helps explain the significance of Song of Songs 1:3. A good name matters. Character matters. Reputation matters. The maiden is drawn to the beloved because his name is like poured out ointment. It is pleasing, refreshing, and honorable.

She says, “therefore do the virgins love thee.” Other young women recognize his honorable qualities. This does not mean they all have the same covenant relationship with him. Rather, it means his character is publicly recognizable. Her love is not based on a private fantasy that no one else can see. She loves a man whose worth is evident.

This is a sober word for marriage. A woman should not marry a man she has to constantly excuse, hide, defend, or spiritually drag into maturity. A man should be the kind of man whose character can be respected. Likewise, a man should not choose a woman merely on physical beauty while ignoring wisdom, modesty, loyalty, and virtue.

Proverbs 31:10, “Who can find a virtuous woman? for her price is far above rubies.”

Proverbs 31:30, “Favour is deceitful, and beauty is vain: but a woman that feareth the LORD, she shall be praised.”

Physical attraction is not wrong, Song of Songs clearly proves that. But attraction must be joined to virtue. Beauty without character is dangerous. Desire without covenant is destructive. Love without wisdom becomes foolishness.

The maiden then says, “Draw me, we will run after thee.” She desires to be drawn by him. This language shows both desire and response. She does not want a detached relationship. She wants pursuit, nearness, and movement toward union. At the same time, she wants his leadership. He draws, and she runs after him. The order is not oppressive. It is relational and beautiful. Proper masculine leadership does not crush feminine desire, it awakens and directs it.

The phrase “the king hath brought me into his chambers” likely refers to intimate nearness and privileged access. The king brings her into the private place of his affection. This may be poetic rather than a direct statement of consummation at this point. The larger movement of the book suggests that love is being developed and celebrated in scenes, not necessarily in strict chronological sequence. Either way, the language communicates closeness, honor, and personal delight.

The chamber image also shows that love is not merely public admiration. There is a private dimension to covenant love. A husband and wife share affections, words, memories, joys, burdens, and intimacy that belong uniquely to them. A marriage must have a private world guarded from outsiders. Not everything is for public display. Covenant love has a sacred privacy.

3. Song of Songs 1:4b, The Daughters of Jerusalem Respond

Song of Songs 1:4, “Draw me, we will run after thee: the king hath brought me into his chambers: we will be glad and rejoice in thee, we will remember thy love more than wine: the upright love thee.”

The words “we will run after thee” appear to include the response of the daughters of Jerusalem. They function like an observing chorus in the poetry. They see this love and respond to it with gladness. They are not intruding into the relationship in an immoral way. They are witnesses who recognize the beauty and goodness of honorable love.

Their response shows that godly love is not something shameful. When love is pure, covenantal, and honorable, the community can rejoice in it. A wedding is public because marriage is not merely private passion. It is a covenant recognized before God and man. The private love of husband and wife has a public moral witness.

Proverbs 5:18, “Let thy fountain be blessed: and rejoice with the wife of thy youth.”

Proverbs 5:19, “Let her be as the loving hind and pleasant roe, let her breasts satisfy thee at all times, and be thou ravished always with her love.”

These verses show that Scripture commands a man to rejoice in his wife. The daughters of Jerusalem rejoicing in the love of the couple fits this biblical pattern. Love rightly ordered is a cause for gladness, not embarrassment.

4. Song of Songs 1:4c, The Shulamite Enters the King’s Chamber

Song of Songs 1:4, “Draw me, we will run after thee: the king hath brought me into his chambers: we will be glad and rejoice in thee, we will remember thy love more than wine: the upright love thee.”

The statement “the king hath brought me into his chambers” identifies the beloved with royal dignity. If the beloved is Solomon, this language is straightforward. He is the king. If the scene is poetic, the term still communicates honor, authority, and privilege. She is not merely taken into a common place. She is brought into the king’s chamber.

This can be understood as a picture of relational access. The maiden is brought near. She is welcomed into his affection and confidence. The chamber suggests closeness, security, and personal belonging. In a healthy marriage, a wife is not treated as an outsider to her husband’s heart. She is brought near. She is honored. She is cherished. She is given a place that belongs to no other woman.

This also carries a serious moral warning. The chamber belongs to covenant love. It is not for casual relationships, manipulative seduction, or immoral experimentation. Scripture consistently protects the private intimacy of marriage from defilement.

Exodus 20:14, “Thou shalt not commit adultery.”

Proverbs 6:32, “But whoso committeth adultery with a woman lacketh understanding: he that doeth it destroyeth his own soul.”

The beauty of Song of Songs must be held together with the moral boundaries of the rest of Scripture. The same Bible that celebrates marital love condemns sexual sin. That balance is wisdom.

5. Song of Songs 1:4d, The Daughters of Jerusalem Rejoice in the Couple’s Love

Song of Songs 1:4, “Draw me, we will run after thee: the king hath brought me into his chambers: we will be glad and rejoice in thee, we will remember thy love more than wine: the upright love thee.”

The daughters of Jerusalem say, “we will be glad and rejoice in thee, we will remember thy love more than wine.” Their words reinforce the goodness of this love. They do not treat the couple’s affection as shameful. They recognize that it is worthy of joy.

The phrase “we will remember thy love more than wine” repeats the earlier comparison. Love is better than wine because covenant love brings deeper joy than temporary pleasure. Wine may gladden for a moment, but faithful love leaves a memory. It becomes part of the story of life. This is the kind of love worth remembering.

The verse ends, “the upright love thee.” This is an important phrase. The upright approve of this love because it is honorable. There is a kind of love the upright cannot approve. Adulterous love, lustful love, manipulative love, and selfish love are not righteous. But the love in Song of Songs, understood in its proper covenant frame, is loved by the upright because it reflects God’s good order.

6. Song of Songs 1:4e–6, The Shulamite Considers Her Own Appearance

Song of Songs 1:4, “Draw me, we will run after thee: the king hath brought me into his chambers: we will be glad and rejoice in thee, we will remember thy love more than wine: the upright love thee.”

Song of Songs 1:5, “I am black, but comely, O ye daughters of Jerusalem, as the tents of Kedar, as the curtains of Solomon.”

Song of Songs 1:6, “Look not upon me, because I am black, because the sun hath looked upon me: my mother’s children were angry with me, they made me the keeper of the vineyards, but mine own vineyard have I not kept.”

After the praise of the beloved, the maiden turns attention to herself. She says, “I am black, but comely.” The KJV wording reflects the language of deep darkness or darkened appearance, and the context explains that she has been darkened by the sun. She is not denying her beauty. She is acknowledging both her insecurity and her attractiveness. She says she is dark, but comely. She has been marked by hardship, but she is still lovely.

This is an important emotional moment in the book. The maiden feels the weight of how others may see her. She has worked outdoors. The sun has darkened her skin. In that ancient setting, darker skin from labor could imply lower social status because it showed that a person worked in the fields rather than living a protected life indoors. She compares herself to “the tents of Kedar” and “the curtains of Solomon.” The tents of Kedar were dark, likely made from goat hair, while the curtains of Solomon suggest royal beauty and richness. She holds both ideas together, darkened by hardship, yet still beautiful.

She says, “Look not upon me, because I am black, because the sun hath looked upon me.” This reveals her sensitivity. She does not want to be judged superficially. She knows her appearance bears the marks of labor, family conflict, and difficult circumstances. The sun has looked upon her, meaning her outward appearance has been affected by exposure and work.

Then she explains, “my mother’s children were angry with me, they made me the keeper of the vineyards.” The phrase “my mother’s children” likely refers to her brothers or half brothers. They were angry with her and forced her into vineyard labor. The result was that she cared for the vineyards of others while neglecting her own vineyard. Her own vineyard likely refers to her own appearance, personal care, and perhaps her own life and dignity.

This is a deeply human detail. She has been burdened by others. She has been made to work. She has been treated harshly. She has had to keep the vineyards, but “mine own vineyard have I not kept.” In other words, she has been so consumed with imposed labor and hardship that she has not been able to care for herself as she would have liked.

Yet the text does not present her hardship as making her unlovable. This is vital. She thinks her circumstances may have diminished her beauty, but the beloved will speak to her as beautiful. This teaches that the marks of hardship do not erase worth. A good man sees more than surface polish. He sees humility, strength, faithfulness, and natural beauty.

There is also a broader wisdom principle here. People often assign value wrongly. The world may prize status, cosmetics, wealth, and social ease while undervaluing humility, endurance, loyalty, modesty, and character. Song of Songs corrects that shallow view. The maiden may not look like a pampered palace woman, but she is lovely. She is not less worthy of covenant love because she has suffered.

The phrase “mine own vineyard have I not kept” also warns that a person can become so burdened by external responsibilities that personal care is neglected. In marriage and life, this matters. Work, family pressure, hardship, and responsibility can wear people down. Scripture does not glorify vanity, but neither does it require neglect. A wise person understands that stewardship includes care for one’s own life, body, duties, and soul.

Proverbs 4:23, “Keep thy heart with all diligence, for out of it are the issues of life.”

The maiden’s statement is not only about outward appearance. It also reminds the reader that the inner life must be guarded. A person can keep many vineyards and still neglect the heart. A person can serve others and lose order in his own house. Wisdom requires proper stewardship of both outward responsibilities and inward life.

B. Endearing Words Between Young Lovers

1. Song of Songs 1:7, The Shulamite Speaks to Her Beloved

Song of Songs 1:7, “Tell me, O thou whom my soul loveth, where thou feedest, where thou makest thy flock to rest at noon, for why should I be as one that turneth aside by the flocks of thy companions?”

The maiden now addresses the beloved directly, saying, “Tell me, O thou whom my soul loveth.” This is not casual language. She does not merely say that she finds him attractive. She says her soul loves him. Her affection reaches the inner person. This supports the point that Song of Songs is not merely about physical desire. It is about whole person love, involving body, affection, admiration, loyalty, and longing.

She asks where he feeds his flock and where he makes it rest at noon. The beloved is pictured as a shepherd. If the beloved is Solomon, the shepherd language may be symbolic, since kings in the ancient world were often viewed as shepherds over their people. It may also be part of the poetic setting of the book, where royal and rural images are blended together.

The key point is that she wants to know where he is. Love desires presence. She does not merely want gifts, status, or admiration from a distance. She wants him. She wants to be with the one her soul loves.

She then asks, “for why should I be as one that turneth aside by the flocks of thy companions?” This likely means she does not want to wander around looking for him in a way that would appear immodest or morally questionable. She is careful with her reputation. She wants to find him properly, not appear as a wandering woman seeking just any man.

This is an important mark of virtue. She desires him, but she also guards her modesty and public testimony. Love does not require a woman to cast off discretion. Desire does not excuse foolishness. She wants her beloved, but she wants him honorably.

Proverbs 11:22, “As a jewel of gold in a swine’s snout, so is a fair woman which is without discretion.”

The maiden has desire, but she also has discretion. That combination matters. Modern culture often separates passion from honor, but Scripture keeps them together. Proper love is not cold, but it is also not reckless. She wants to be near him, but she does not want to appear like a loose woman.

2. Song of Songs 1:8–10, The Beloved Praises His Lover

Song of Songs 1:8, “If thou know not, O thou fairest among women, go thy way forth by the footsteps of the flock, and feed thy kids beside the shepherds’ tents.”

Song of Songs 1:9, “I have compared thee, O my love, to a company of horses in Pharaoh’s chariots.”

Song of Songs 1:10, “Thy cheeks are comely with rows of jewels, thy neck with chains of gold.”

The beloved answers her with praise. He calls her “O thou fairest among women.” This is exactly the kind of speech she needs after confessing her insecurity in verses 5 and 6. She has said, “I am black, but comely.” He responds by calling her the fairest among women. He does not reinforce her insecurity. He speaks life, beauty, and assurance to her.

This is a major practical lesson for husbands. A husband should not be stingy with honorable praise. A wife should know that she is beautiful to her husband. She should not have to starve emotionally while the world offers counterfeit affirmation. The beloved praises her specifically, repeatedly, and personally.

He tells her to follow the footsteps of the flock and feed her young goats beside the shepherds’ tents. In poetic form, he tells her how to find him. He welcomes her presence. He does not push her away. Her desire to be near him is received with affection.

Then he says, “I have compared thee, O my love, to a company of horses in Pharaoh’s chariots.” At first this may sound strange to modern readers, but in the ancient world this was a strong compliment. Pharaoh’s horses were majestic, powerful, disciplined, beautiful, and associated with royal splendor. The comparison likely emphasizes her beauty, grace, strength, and captivating effect.

Some interpreters note that if Pharaoh’s chariots were normally drawn by stallions, the image of a mare among them would suggest a powerful attraction. Either way, the beloved is saying that she is not ordinary to him. She is striking. She stands out. She captures attention.

He continues, “Thy cheeks are comely with rows of jewels, thy neck with chains of gold.” He notices her adornment and praises her beauty. The Bible does not condemn feminine beauty or adornment in itself. What Scripture condemns is vanity, immodesty, seduction, and pride. Here, her adornment is part of honorable beauty within covenant love.

1 Peter 3:3, “Whose adorning let it not be that outward adorning of plaiting the hair, and of wearing of gold, or of putting on of apparel,”

1 Peter 3:4, “But let it be the hidden man of the heart, in that which is not corruptible, even the ornament of a meek and quiet spirit, which is in the sight of God of great price.”

Peter is not forbidding all outward care, because if he were, he would also be forbidding apparel itself. He is teaching that outward adornment must not be the woman’s foundation. The hidden person of the heart matters most. Song of Songs and 1 Peter together give balance. Beauty can be appreciated, but character must govern beauty.

3. Song of Songs 1:11, The Daughters of Jerusalem Offer Gifts to the Shulamite

Song of Songs 1:11, “We will make thee borders of gold with studs of silver.”

The daughters of Jerusalem respond by offering adornment, “borders of gold with studs of silver.” They recognize that the beloved values the maiden, and they join in honoring her. His public affection affects how others treat her. When a man honors his woman rightly, others see that she is valued.

This is a practical truth. A husband’s public treatment of his wife matters. If he demeans her, others may feel free to dishonor her. If he cherishes her, others see that she is not to be treated cheaply. The beloved’s praise creates an atmosphere of honor around her.

This also shows that love is not isolated from community. The daughters of Jerusalem are witnesses. They rejoice, they admire, and they bless. A godly relationship should not produce shame, secrecy, and confusion. It should be able to stand in the light.

4. Song of Songs 1:12–14, The Shulamite Describes How Precious Her Beloved Is to Her

Song of Songs 1:12, “While the king sitteth at his table, my spikenard sendeth forth the smell thereof.”

Song of Songs 1:13, “A bundle of myrrh is my wellbeloved unto me, he shall lie all night betwixt my breasts.”

Song of Songs 1:14, “My beloved is unto me as a cluster of camphire in the vineyards of Engedi.”

The maiden now speaks of her beloved using fragrant imagery. While the king sits at his table, her spikenard sends forth its fragrance. Spikenard was a costly and fragrant ointment. The image suggests attraction, beauty, and the drawing power of love. She is aware of her ability to please him, but this is not presented as manipulative or immoral. It belongs inside their honorable affection.

She says, “A bundle of myrrh is my wellbeloved unto me.” Myrrh was precious and fragrant. The beloved is like something treasured, close, and pleasing. She then says, “he shall lie all night betwixt my breasts.” The language is intimate, and it should be handled reverently. The image likely refers to a sachet or bundle of myrrh worn close to the body, its fragrance remaining with her through the night. The point is that the beloved’s presence, memory, and affection remain close to her heart even when he is not physically present.

This teaches emotional security. His love stays with her. She carries the sense of his affection. A healthy marriage should create this kind of security. The wife should not live constantly uncertain of her husband’s love. His words, actions, faithfulness, and affection should remain with her like a fragrance.

She then says, “My beloved is unto me as a cluster of camphire in the vineyards of Engedi.” Engedi was an oasis in the wilderness, a place of water, life, beauty, and refreshment. In a dry and barren region, Engedi stood out as a place of flourishing. She compares her beloved to fragrant blossoms in such a place. To her, he is refreshment in a weary world.

This is what covenant love should be. A husband and wife should be a place of refreshment to one another, not merely another burden. Life is hard. Work is hard. The world is full of pressure. Marriage, when ordered under God, should be a garden in the wilderness, a place where faithfulness, affection, peace, and delight are cultivated.

Proverbs 18:22, “Whoso findeth a wife findeth a good thing, and obtaineth favour of the LORD.”

Marriage is a favor from the LORD when it is received and practiced according to wisdom. Song of Songs shows that this favor is not merely practical. It is emotional, affectionate, physical, and deeply personal.

5. Song of Songs 1:15, The Beloved Praises the Beauty of the Shulamite

Song of Songs 1:15, “Behold, thou art fair, my love, behold, thou art fair, thou hast doves’ eyes.”

The beloved again praises her. “Behold, thou art fair, my love, behold, thou art fair.” The repetition matters. He does not say it once and move on. He lingers over it. He wants her to know she is beautiful to him.

This is not flattery in the sinful sense. It is covenant praise. A man should tell his wife what is true, good, and beautiful about her. Many women carry insecurities, and the maiden has already revealed some of hers. The beloved’s words directly answer that insecurity.

He says, “thou hast doves’ eyes.” Doves suggest gentleness, purity, tenderness, and beauty. Eyes often reveal the inner person. He is not merely praising external features. He sees something gentle and lovely in her expression. Her beauty is not only in ornaments, skin, or form. It is seen in the eyes, which reveal affection, sincerity, and spirit.

Matthew 6:22, “The light of the body is the eye, if therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light.”

While Matthew 6 is speaking in a different context, it shows that Scripture recognizes the eye as revealing inner orientation. The beloved’s praise of her eyes suggests that he sees beauty in her inner disposition.

6. Song of Songs 1:16–17, The Shulamite Responds with Kind Words

Song of Songs 1:16, “Behold, thou art fair, my beloved, yea, pleasant: also our bed is green.”

Song of Songs 1:17, “The beams of our house are cedar, and our rafters of fir.”

The maiden responds to his praise with praise of her own. “Behold, thou art fair, my beloved, yea, pleasant.” This mutuality is important. He praises her, and she praises him. Love is not one sided. A healthy marriage includes mutual admiration, mutual delight, and mutual honor.

She calls him fair and pleasant. She is attracted to him, but she also finds him pleasing in his presence and manner. He is not merely impressive. He is pleasant to her. This matters because many people can be outwardly impressive while being harsh, selfish, arrogant, or exhausting in private. The beloved is pleasant to her.

She then says, “also our bed is green.” The image is likely pastoral and poetic, suggesting freshness, life, and natural beauty. Their love is pictured in terms of the outdoors, with greenery, cedar, and fir. The language may describe a countryside setting where nature itself becomes the imagery of their affection. The emphasis is freshness, vitality, and delight.

She continues, “The beams of our house are cedar, and our rafters of fir.” Cedar and fir were strong and beautiful woods. The imagery suggests stability, fragrance, shelter, and permanence. Their love is not pictured as cheap or temporary. It is like a house built with strong beams. This points toward the covenant nature of their relationship.

A marriage needs both passion and structure. Song of Songs has affection, longing, and desire, but it also points to permanence, exclusivity, and shelter. Love that has no house is unstable. Love that has no covenant becomes dangerous. But love inside the strong beams of covenant can flourish.

Ecclesiastes 4:9, “Two are better than one, because they have a good reward for their labour.”

Ecclesiastes 4:10, “For if they fall, the one will lift up his fellow, but woe to him that is alone when he falleth, for he hath not another to help him up.”

Ecclesiastes 4:11, “Again, if two lie together, then they have heat, but how can one be warm alone?”

Ecclesiastes 4:12, “And if one prevail against him, two shall withstand him, and a threefold cord is not quickly broken.”

These verses fit the wisdom context of Song of Songs. Marriage is companionship, strength, help, warmth, and covenant unity. Song of Songs adds the poetic dimension of delight, beauty, affection, and desire.

Summary and Theological Emphasis

Song of Songs 1 introduces the reader to the beauty of covenant love. The chapter begins by identifying the book as the supreme song associated with Solomon. It then presents the maiden’s desire for the beloved, her admiration for his name and character, the rejoicing of the daughters of Jerusalem, her insecurity over her appearance and difficult background, and the mutual praise exchanged between the lovers.

The chapter teaches that love must include both desire and character. The maiden desires his kisses, but she also values his name. The beloved praises her beauty, but he also speaks in a way that gives her security and honor. The daughters of Jerusalem rejoice because upright love is worthy of celebration. The entire chapter rejects both immoral sensuality and false spirituality. It shows that romantic and marital love, rightly ordered under God, is good.

Previous
Previous

Song of Songs Chapter 2

Next
Next

Ecclesiastes Chapter 12